

ALTERNATIVE REPORT
UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW (UPR) OF HUMAN RIGHTS
A Civil Society Analysis on Corruption and Transparency in São Tomé and Príncipe
Submitted to the UN Human Rights Platform
Submission Date: July 16, 2025
1. Introduction
The Center for Public Integrity of São Tomé and Príncipe (CIPSTP) is a civil society organization dedicated to promoting good governance, transparency, and the defense of Human Rights in São Tomé and Príncipe. This Alternative Report is submitted within the framework of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the United Nations Human Rights Council, aiming to provide an independent civil society perspective on progress and challenges in protecting Human Rights in the country.
This document holds historical significance, being the first Human Rights Alternative Report entirely prepared by civil society within the national territory. Its scope reflects the maturity and strength of local organizations in actively contributing to the scrutiny and improvement of the Human Rights framework in São Tomé and Príncipe.
This report focuses exclusively on the theme of Corruption and Transparency, a crucial area for the development and guarantee of fundamental rights in São Tomé and Príncipe.
Join us in advocating for a more transparent and just São Tomé and Príncipe!
2. Methodology
The preparation of this Alternative Report was based on a comprehensive and participatory methodology, covering the period since the last UPR cycle (3rd cycle). The collection of information aimed at obtaining credible and reliable data, essential for an in-depth analysis.
Detailed Methodology for Data Collection
- Online Questionnaire for Santomean Civil Society Organizations (CSOs):
- Application period: June 10 to July 10, 2025
- Number of CSOs contacted: 4
- Number of responses received: 3
- Topics covered in the questionnaire: Corruption, transparency, and Justice in STP
- Tool used: Google Forms
- Interviews with Key Individuals:
- Number of interviews conducted: 7
- Interviewee profile: Human rights experts, activists, community leaders, former public officials, representatives of vulnerable groups
- Topics focused on in interviews: Justice, Corruption, and Transparency
- Confidentiality: Confirmed that confidentiality was guaranteed, including anonymity when requested, and specifically for Senior specialist officials who requested it.
- Consultation with Vulnerable Groups:
- Types of groups consulted: Women, youth, rural communities, and Groups of People with Physical, Motor, and Visual Disabilities from the Platform of People with Handicaps.
- Consultation methods: Focus groups, individual conversations
- Key emerging themes: Briefly synthesize the most relevant concerns of these groups
- Event-Based Data and Statistics Analysis:
- Data sources: Annual reports from government institutions (Court of Auditors, Public Prosecutor’s Office, etc.), reports from international organizations (Transparency International, Afrobarometer), press news, etc.
- Types of data analyzed: Number of corruption complaints, judicial proceedings, results of perception surveys, etc.
3. National Context of the UPR in São Tomé and Príncipe: Focus on Corruption
São Tomé and Príncipe, a young democracy, faces challenges in the effective implementation of Human Rights. The national regulatory framework, although existing, lacks harmonization and full application with international instruments.
Information on the Level of Implementation of Recommendations from the Last Cycle (3rd Cycle) of the UPR:
São Tomé and Príncipe received a total of 0 recommendations in the last UPR cycle. Of these, 0 were accepted and 0 were noted.
0
Recommendations Received
in the 3rd UPR cycle (2021)
0
Recommendations Accepted
A commitment made by the State.
0
Recommendations Noted
Areas requiring further attention.
The implementation of recommendations from previous cycles, focused on Corruption, has been inconsistent. Progress is observed in the creation of legal frameworks, but their effective application and accountability remain challenges. There is stagnation in ensuring the full independence of control institutions, which contributes to the perception of impunity.
Especially Affected or Most Vulnerable Groups:
CIPSTP’s analysis indicates that the following groups are particularly affected by issues of Corruption:
- Rural populations and coastal communities: Frequently marginalized and disproportionately affected by corruption in development projects or natural resource management or affecting their basic rights.
- Women and girls: May face increased vulnerabilities to specific forms of corruption, such as gender corruption, which limits their access to services and opportunities.
Statistics or Data to Support the Analysis:
- Perception of Corruption: Recent surveys (e.g., Afrobarometer) indicate that more than 70% of citizens in São Tomé and Príncipe perceive corruption as a “very big” problem in the country.
- Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI): São Tomé and Príncipe has consistently received low scores on the CPI, reflecting a widespread perception of high levels of corruption in the public sector.
- Judicial Cases: The number of judicial cases for corruption crimes resulting in effective convictions remains very low, suggesting a high rate of impunity.
4. Thematic Analysis and Recommendations: Corruption and Transparency
The recommendations presented by CIPSTP are formulated following the S.M.A.R.T. methodology (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound), aiming to maximize their effectiveness and facilitate the monitoring of their implementation.
Relevant UPR-Info Recommendations:
- 106.57 (Australia, Cycle 3): “Strictly enforce anti-corruption laws, including through the investigation and prosecution of persons who commit such offences.” (Supported)
- 106.55 (USA, Cycle 3): “Enact reforms to reduce corruption, increase transparency of financial assets of political leaders, investigate incidents of police corruption, and conduct trials of public officials accused of corruption.” (Supported)
- 106.50 (Indonesia, Cycle 3): “Continue enhancing the capacities of institutions to deal with organized crime, corruption and other challenges related to the rule of law.” (Supported)
Civil Society Analysis:
Corruption continues to be a significant obstacle to sustainable development and the full realization of human rights in São Tomé and Príncipe. Public perception of corruption is high, and prevention and combat mechanisms still show fragilities. The lack of resources and the limited independence of control institutions, such as the Court of Auditors and the General Inspectorate of Finance, compromise their effectiveness.
Civil society analysis reveals that, despite existing laws, implementation is weak and impunity persists. Lack of transparency and limited access to public information hinder monitoring and accountability. A crucial challenge is the absence of two fundamental legal instruments: the Public Probity Law and the Public and Administrative Information Access Law. Although Civil Society, through the Pro-PALOP-TL Project (phase 2), developed draft laws for both and submitted them to the National Assembly via Petition, these have not yet been approved. The creation and implementation of these instruments are fundamental for institutions like COSIL (Public Procurement Commission) and the Ministry of Finance to disclose open documents, allowing NGOs and the general public to access information on public contracts and tenders for more effective scrutiny of the executive. The absence of these laws also hinders full compliance with international obligations, such as those stipulated in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) and the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating Corruption (AUCPCC), to which São Tomé and Príncipe is a signatory.
Corruption Perception vs. Effective Convictions
This chart illustrates the stark contrast between the high public perception of corruption and the low number of effective convictions, highlighting the challenge of impunity.
CIPSTP’s Recommendations (SMART and Priority):
5. Best Practices and Challenges of Civil Society
CIPSTP, as a civil society actor, recognizes the crucial role of CSOs in the UPR process. Our participation is guided by principles of credibility and collaboration.
Practices Adopted:
- The preparation of this report reflects the practice of joint submissions (through collaboration with other CSOs in questionnaires and interviews), which increases the visibility and credibility of the information.
- The use of concrete data and technical language aims to ensure that our concerns are clearly understood by UN Member States.
Challenges:
- Civil society in São Tomé and Príncipe faces challenges such as limited resources for continuous monitoring and advocacy.
- There is a need to strengthen the capacity for analysis and formulation of SMART recommendations more broadly across all CSOs.
- Ensuring a robust and safe civic space for organizations to operate is also a constant concern.
6. Conclusion and Call to Action
This Alternative Report by CIPSTP underlines that, despite some progress, São Tomé and Príncipe faces persistent challenges in the full implementation of UPR recommendations, particularly in the area of Corruption and Transparency. This area requires urgent attention and concrete actions to guarantee human rights for all its citizens.
CIPSTP reiterates its commitment to continue monitoring the human rights situation and to work in collaboration with the State and other partners towards building a more just, transparent, and equitable society.
We call upon the Government of São Tomé and Príncipe to seriously consider the recommendations presented in this report, validate them, and implement them effectively and transparently, honoring its international human rights commitments. The active participation of civil society is a fundamental pillar for the success of this process and for the sustainable development of the country.